Last week I had a bit of fun with my post comparing voice over acting to porn acting. In the midst of my brainstorm, it was also clear to me that voice over acting isn’t exactly like porn acting. There are several important differences. So, in the spirit of providing both sides to argument, here are all the ways in which voice over acting differs from porn acting.
- No fluffers.
- The talent generally isn’t as sexy
- In porn, no one cares about the script
- Video is more important in porn. Audio rules for voice overs.
- You can repeat the money shot as many times as the director needs you in a short amount of time without needing a break to, um, ¨recharge¨
- No cameras in the studio
- Don’t have to get naked.
- Don’t have to worry about STDs
- When you’re done, you don’t need a shower
- There are no galleries on the internet of you performing
- No one cares what you look like naked. If they do, it’s useful to remember #2
- Again, no fluffers
So what did I miss? Would love to hear from you other differences between voice over acting and porn acting. Can’t wait to see the responses!
By the way, if you need a locutor en inglés en Bogotá, (English voice over in Bogotá) let me know!
If you like this post, sign up for our newsletter or subscribe to our RSS feed to keep up with Career Break Secrets’ career break and travel advice.
Tags: Re-entry
